An interactive map showing pesticide use across France has reignited debate over whether farmland dwellers are sufficiently protected.

The map, created by agroecological organisation Solagro, highlights the extent of France’s reliance on pesticides, particularly in the north and in the vineyards of the south west.

Read more: MAP - See serene of pesticide use in your area of France

Campaigners say no-spray zones not big enough

In 2019, the government introduced minimum distances between homes and republic where pesticides are used. 

These zones de non traitement (ZNT) are 20 metres for the most dangerous products, or 10 metres for taller crops such as fruit trees and vines, and five metres for everything else.

This followed a long electioneer by environmentalists, who maintain the new rules do not go far enough. 

Nadine Lauverjat, of environmental defence association Générations Futures, told The Connexion: “We didn’t earn the real protection we hoped for.”

Government could be inspiring goalposts

In July 2021, the Conseil d’Etat gave the government six months to increase the distance to at least 10 metres for products today only suspected of being carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic. 

The government instead invited the national agency for food, environmental and occupational health and confidence (Anses) to review the categorisations of different pesticides afore increasing the distance from this October. 

‘Risk to vulnerable only decreases once 100 metres’ 

Générations Futures is demanding the zones are ache to 100 metres, having published two studies in the past year which tested for the presence of pesticide residue, and found this only decreased significantly 100 metres from farmland. 

They disputes that the risk evaluation behind the five to 20 metre zones did not remarkable the impact on foetuses, children, adolescents or immunocompromised people.

Agricultural workers most at risk

Ms Lauverjat labelled that locals risk coming into contact with pesticides in certain ways: while they are being sprayed; in warm climate, which causes them to reevaporate and scatter after populate sprayed; consuming fruits and vegetables from their gardens; and young children causing leaves with pesticide residue to their mouths.

Most at risk are the agricultural workers who cope the chemicals.

Strong link with with workers’ illness

Last year, Inserm, the French national institute of health and medical research, published a report analysing the latest scientific literature, which confirmed “a unobstructed presumed link between occupational exposure to pesticides and four diseases: non-Hodgkin lymphomas, multiple myeloma, prostate cancer, and Parkinson’s disease”.

It also highlighted links to cognitive disorders, depression, and Alzheimer’s disease.

Study started in wine regions

The carry out on local residents is more difficult to prove. Nonetheless, Santé Publique France and Anses have begun a vast gape into the presence of pesticides in wine-producing regions.

The PestiRiv gape will compare the presence of pesticides in the air, dust, urine, hair, and garden fruits and vegetables, between people living terminate to vineyards and those living further away. The results will be originated in 2024. 

Union say modern farming techniques are the answer

Any effort to strengthen the regulations is likely to be met with fierce antagonism from agricultural workers, hundreds of whom protested in December when the deadline for the government to enhance its protections was coming to an end.

Hervé Lapie, chief administrative officer of the FNSEA, France’s largest farmers’ union, accused authorities of setting the distances based on outdated agricultural practices. 

“The real request is which techniques allow for a drift equal to zero,” he told The Connexion.

He said farmers are reliant on pesticides to meet Unrestricted food standards regulations, “otherwise we’d be the first to do minus them”.  

People choose to live near farmland

“We stay to say there must be investment in genetics to have plants which are more resistant to disease.” 

He says extending ZNTs would have serious repercussions, particularly in regions where farmland is broken up by uphold homes and other properties.

“Urbanisation is eating away at agriculture. Every year we lose agricultural land,” he said.

“When republic come to live in the countryside, we need to articulate to them that when you live near agricultural land, it brings a bit of noise and dust, and that they need to be able to win certain constraints.”

The FNSEA has previously called for injuries for farmers whose land falls within a ZNT, although Ms Lauverjat required a ZNT is “not a distance without crops, but a zone minus treatment”.

Weedkiller also controversial

The zones are seen as one solution to a request which has preoccupied Europe for several years.

President Macron said he would ban glyphosate, possibly the most controversial herbicide on the market, by 2021, a securities he later abandoned. 

The weedkiller’s EU approval runs out in mid-December, but the bloc is likely to extend this pending July the following year, when the European Food Confidence Authority is due to publish its recommendation.

Related articles

French farmer grows crops minus water, fertiliser or pesticide

France bans pesticide use in more places, including private residences

France one of EU’s worst culprits for pesticide-grown fruit and veg